Dunbar’s Number and Communication Limits
Our brains, it turns out, have a finite capacity for maintaining social connections. British anthropologist and psychologist Robin Dunbar played a significant role in uncovering this, determining that our brains can effectively track no more than 150 active relationships at a time, whether friends, colleagues, or acquaintances. This finding, known as “Dunbar’s Number,” has become a cornerstone in the field of social psychology.
Imagine being at a large party: even if you have at least a passing familiarity with everyone there, you’ll still find that you genuinely interact with only a small group of people. Or think about your social media networks—among hundreds of “friends” and followers, you truly stay in touch with just a handful.
Dunbar’s Number, paradoxically, doesn’t limit our desire for social interactions but serves as a reminder that our brains are wired for quality over quantity in relationships. This doesn’t mean that communication courses and self-development are unnecessary. On the contrary, they help enhance the quality of the connections you already have, making you a more attentive and empathetic conversationalist, which is invaluable in its own right.
Take large corporations and organizations as an example. In poorly organized work environments, there’s often an “information overload” and a lack of personal interaction. When managers and employees understand Dunbar’s Number, they can restructure their communication to strengthen key relationships and efficiently coordinate their work.
Pride has no place here. Dunbar’s Number reflects not our weakness but an inherent psychological characteristic. Learning to interact effectively with those around us helps deepen these connections. Ultimately, with knowledge of Dunbar’s Number, we can build more meaningful and profound relationships within our limited yet valuable circle of acquaintances.
To gain a deeper understanding of why our brains have such limitations and how this impacts daily social life, we recommend checking out various sources on the topic, such as the relevant Wikipedia article. Grasping these concepts will enable us to more effectively harness our social potential and learn to better maintain meaningful connections in communication.
The Dunbar Number and the Limits of Social Connections
As inherently social beings, humans have an innate drive to interact and form deep connections with others. However, there’s a natural limit to the number of active social ties we can maintain, known as the Dunbar Number. In a lifetime, we can sustain anywhere from 100 to 230 social relationships, but the optimal number for fostering meaningful and profound connections is around 150. This figure isn’t arbitrary; it possesses deep evolutionary roots.
The concept of the Dunbar Number emerged from the work of British anthropologist Robin Dunbar, who initially studied the social structures of monkeys. He observed that the number of social connections among these primates was closely linked to the size of their neocortex—the brain region responsible for higher functions such as consciousness, language, and social interaction. Applying this pattern to humans, Dunbar discovered that our brains also impose a natural cap on the number of significant social bonds we can manage.
Dunbar’s model of social networks breaks down into four levels, resembling concentric circles of trust: your closest five friends, then 15 close friends, followed by 50 good acquaintances, and finally 150 people with whom you regularly interact. Studies and real-world observations support these tiers. For example, in Fortune 500 companies, an optimal team size is often around 150 members, which allows for effective interaction and communication among the group.
These findings are also corroborated by historical communities. Ancient villages and towns often had populations around 150, which promoted cohesion and harmonious interaction within the group. Interestingly, even in modern online communities such as Facebook, the average person actively engages with approximately the same number of friends—about 150.
Ultimately, Dunbar’s number illustrates that our capacity to forge and maintain social connections isn’t limitless. It’s a wise reminder about the significance of having meaningful interactions, stressing quality over quantity in our social circles.
The Quality of Social Connections
It’s crucial to highlight that maintaining high-quality social connections requires a conscious effort. It’s not just about knowing someone’s name and surname, but involves a deeper understanding of their current affairs, problems, aspirations, and desires. For instance, if a colleague is going through a tough time at work, it’s important not only to express sympathy but also to offer concrete assistance or practical advice. Doing so lays a solid foundation for mutual trust and support.
for free
Our capacity for social connections is influenced by the amount of information we can store. According to psychologists, the human brain can foster meaningful relationships with roughly 150 people. For example, trying to keep up friendships with all the relatives and friends you’ve ever studied or worked with can be a daunting task. Therefore, it’s essential to prioritize the quality of relationships over their quantity.
An intriguing example can be observed in traditional societies, where connections among community members are based on an in-depth knowledge of one another. People there often remember not just personal achievements and struggles but also the history of each other’s family trees. Such profound bonds foster an environment of mutual understanding and support, which is rarely found in modern metropolises.
Social Connections and Layers
Social connections form a complex structure consisting of several layers. As these layers expand, they encompass a greater number of relationships, but the level of closeness and frequency of interaction tend to decrease. We all know the concept of a “circle of friends,” yet few of us reflect on just how many layers these circles can have.
For instance, the innermost layer of social connections includes immediate family members—parents, spouses, and children. These are the people with whom we typically spend the most time and share our deepest feelings and experiences. What happens in their lives often has a direct impact on our own. Most of the time, we also serve as primary support figures for one another.
The first layer encompasses our closest friends, those whom we might refer to as our “soul siblings.” Even though these individuals are not related by blood, they play a crucial role in our emotional well-being. Take Elena and Maria, for example. Friends since college, they remain connected despite having different careers and family responsibilities. They manage to find time for regular meet-ups and support each other during tough times.
The second layer consists of good acquaintances. These are the people we interact with fairly often, but our bond with them isn’t as deep. For instance, coworkers might make up a significant part of this layer. While collaborating on shared projects can bring them fairly close, personal information and deep emotions usually stay out of these interactions.
The broader circles include neighbors, casual acquaintances, and people from clubs or activities where we share common interests. In these layers, interactions rarely go beyond polite conversation or occasional meetings. For example, Michael plays soccer every Saturday with a group of people. While he seldom meets them outside of the game, their friendly competition nurtures a positive relationship.
The farther someone is from us in these social layers, the less space they occupy in our memory and the less information about them we retain. Understanding the hierarchy of these layers helps us appreciate the uniqueness and diversity of our social connections, highlighting the importance of each one in our lives.
Social Networks and the Dunbar Number
A person’s social network size is closely tied to the volume of their amygdala and neocortex. Research has shown that the Dunbar number, which hovers around 150, acts as a natural limit for establishing and maintaining stable social connections. This explains why managing large groups on social networks can be challenging for many individuals.
The principle of the Dunbar number is supported not only by psychological studies but also by biological evidence. For instance, primatologists have found that the size of primates’ social groups is related to the size of their brains. The larger the brain, the more social interactions they can sustain. Similar patterns are observed in humans, indicating that our social circles are limited by both cultural and biological factors.
Interestingly, in the age of modern technology and social media, the Dunbar number takes on new significance. While people may have thousands of “friends” and followers online, genuinely strong and meaningful relationships still fall within this magical number of 150. Studies support this, showing that despite a multitude of virtual connections, real and deep friendships remain constrained.
Understanding these mechanisms can be valuable not only for scientists but also for managers, marketers, and community organizers. Knowing about the natural limits on the size of social groups can help build more effective teams, promote social harmony, and boost collective productivity.
Dunbar’s Number and Social Connections
What exactly is Dunbar’s Number, and why is it so crucial for understanding human relationships and our daily interactions? Robin Dunbar, a British anthropologist specializing in human social behavior, introduced the concept that each of us has a limited capacity for maintaining social connections. According to Dunbar, this capacity is roughly 150 people—those within our close-knit circle with whom we share emotional bonds and spend a significant amount of time. This figure is aptly named “Dunbar’s Number” in honor of its originator.
Picture your social network as a vast web, where each individual is connected to several others. A complex interplay of passive and active factors—such as shared interests, geographic proximity, and frequency of contact—influences the quality and frequency of interactions among members of this network. For instance, friends you work or study with are in your closest circle, while distant relatives or acquaintances from another country belong to the outer circles. It’s worth noting that the more friends you have, the less time and attention you can devote to each one. Unfortunately, this principle holds true: our brains have cognitive limitations that restrict the number of names and relationships we can effectively manage. When Dunbar’s Number is exceeded, amusing yet awkward situations can arise—like forgetting names or resorting to vague descriptions such as “that guy from the party” or “the girl in the red dress.”
Modern social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter make it easy to expand your circle of acquaintances and stay in touch with hundreds, even thousands, of people. However, this expansion comes at a cost: the quality of these connections tends to decline. Research indicates that while the number of active connections may increase, the number of passive connections grows even faster. This makes managing such a large volume of information and maintaining all these relationships overwhelmingly difficult. Once you surpass about 150 people, your network can grow to 500 or even 1,500 “friends.” But the depth and significance of these connections greatly diminish, leaving many of these individuals as mere fleeting presences in your news feed.
It’s virtually impossible for people to remember 5,000 names and faces, resulting in very superficial connections. It’s becoming increasingly common to forget why you’re connected with certain individuals. For example, you might interact online with someone you once spoke to at a party or exchanged business cards with at a conference, but now you only remember them because of their social media statuses or photos.
Dunbar’s Number in Business and Social Connections
Dunbar’s Number is a concept introduced by anthropologist Robin Dunbar, positing that a person can maintain stable social relationships with about 150 people at once. This idea has found extensive application in various domains, including science, business, and social networks.
A standout example of employing Dunbar’s Number in business is W.L. Gore and Associates, renowned for their innovations in materials like Gore-Tex. They applied this concept to optimize their workspace by capping their building capacity at 150 people. This approach fostered a more comfortable work environment, reduced stress levels, and minimized conflicts among employees, thus strengthening their corporate culture.
Furthermore, the ideal size for an effective team in business is also guided by Dunbar’s Number, typically capped at 15 members or fewer. These mini-teams, or “micro-tribes,” are formed with clear missions and shielded from interference by other groups, boosting efficiency and Decision-making speed. A notable application of this principle was seen at Amazon, with the creation of “two-pizza teams”—groups small enough to be fed with two pizzas, or about 10 people. This strategy enabled Amazon to scale quickly and adapt to changing market conditions.
In the nonprofit community network HiPower, aimed at supporting women leaders, groups are similarly limited to 10–15 members. These groups serve as a platform for sharing experiences and knowledge, enabling participants to achieve significant career success and form strong, lasting connections. HiPower’s success illustrates how an understanding of Dunbar’s Number can be leveraged to create efficient and mutually beneficial social networks.
For mid-level managers in business, understanding and applying Dunbar’s number can be incredibly beneficial. It helps organize and manage team efforts more effectively, improves communication, and strengthens personal connections within the group. Having this knowledge in a manager’s toolkit, coupled with peak-efficiency training such as the “Best communication techniques” course, can significantly boost team productivity and streamline organizational processes.
Dunbar’s number not only tests a person’s social capabilities but also fosters the development of successful communication skills. Recognizing and utilizing this concept can encourage personal growth, which in turn, leads to success in both professional and personal endeavors. For instance, at Zappos, programs that promote social interaction and social responsibility are developed, thereby boosting employee morale and strengthening their bond with the company.
.svg)
