Adaptive Leadership Styles for Managers: Life Cycle Theory, Directive Management, and Employee Engagement Tips

Life Cycle Theory and Situational Leadership

Today’s corporate landscape is filled with numerous models that offer effective methods for leading and managing teams. Among the most significant are Fiedler’s model, the concepts proposed by Adizes, and the approaches of Vroom, Yetton, and Jago. However, in this article, we’ll focus on the uniquely fascinating life cycle theory developed by American researchers Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard.

Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard conducted extensive studies in the realm of leadership and arrived at an interesting conclusion: to be truly effective, a leader must adapt to ever-changing circumstances and the specific needs of the team. This adaptive leadership style is known as situational leadership.

Hersey and Blanchard’s life cycle theory suggests that every team goes through several key stages of development—from formation to high-level task execution. Each phase requires a distinct management approach and the application of different leadership styles.

For instance, during the initial formation stage, a team might need a more directive leadership style, where the leader clearly outlines what needs to be done and how. As the team moves to the storming stage, where conflicts and disputes arise, the leader should shift focus to coaching to help the team overcome differences and find common ground. When the team reaches the norming stage and begins to operate more cohesively, the leader can adopt a more delegating style, granting team members greater freedom and autonomy to showcase their abilities. Finally, at the performing stage, when the team is mature and achieving high-level results, the leader can transition to a supporting style, providing minimal interference while offering advice and support as needed.

These stages illustrate how the development level of employees and the team as a whole can vary, requiring the leader to be both flexible and adaptable. Hersey and Blanchard’s approach emphasizes assessing the situation and the team’s capabilities to select the most suitable leadership style.

Applying the life cycle theory and situational leadership is crucial not only for building a successful career and managing effective organizations but also in personal life. It aids in improving interactions and understanding among individuals.

The Fascinating Theory of Leadership Lifecycle

Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard, prominent researchers in management, have introduced an exciting theory known as the Leadership Lifecycle. According to their studies, the effectiveness of leadership styles is directly linked to the maturity level of leaders. Here, maturity is defined not just by education and professional experience, but also by the level of responsibility and the drive to achieve set goals.

Interestingly, the term “maturity” isn’t confined to the characteristics of an individual alone. It must also be considered in conjunction with the specific situation in which the leader operates. This means that a leader may—and should—vary their style depending on the maturity level of a particular employee or the entire team. Such flexibility allows leaders to adapt effectively to various situations and groups.

The Leadership Lifecycle theory includes four distinct leadership styles: “Directing,” “Coaching,” “Supporting,” and “Delegating.” For instance, the “Directing” style is suitable for employees with low maturity levels who need clear instructions and constant oversight. In this case, the leader needs to be highly directive and specific to ensure tasks are completed.

For individuals with moderate maturity, the “Coaching” style is more appropriate. Here, the leader not only gives orders but also explains their point of view, provides reasoning, and motivates the subordinates. This style is ideal for employees who have basic skills but still require guidance and inspiration.

The “Supporting” style fits those with moderate to high maturity. In this scenario, the leader acts more as a mentor or consultant, actively participating in discussions and Decision-making processes. For example, during an employee’s professional growth, the leader might involve them significantly in developing strategies and plans.

The “Delegate” style is ideal for individuals with a high level of maturity. This approach empowers team members to make decisions independently, without needing constant supervision from their leader. It’s particularly effective in highly skilled teams, where employees have an in-depth knowledge of their field and can operate autonomously. Examples of this can be seen in IT companies, where seasoned developers take charge of projects and devise their own strategies for execution.

The “Directive” Management Style

The “Directive” management style is one of the most popular and widely used in the business world. It primarily focuses on task completion, often placing less emphasis on developing and maintaining interpersonal relationships with subordinates. This style becomes particularly relevant in scenarios where employees exhibit low levels of maturity or competence and are unable to handle tasks on their own.

In such situations, the manager takes on the role of an active conductor of the process. They develop detailed instructions, stringently monitor task completion, and maintain tight control over each phase of the work. This approach helps minimize the risk of errors and deviations from the set course. For instance, if a new employee is assigned a complex project, the manager might break it down into smaller steps and explain each one thoroughly, ensuring a more effective grasp of the process.

Additionally, the “Directive” style often proves justified when subordinates are either unwilling or unable to tackle tasks independently. In these cases, the manager must maintain an active role and provide clear, unequivocal instructions to achieve the desired outcome. Imagine a production line in a factory where each worker performs a specific operation. If one of the workers doesn’t know exactly what to do or how to do it, the entire line could come to a halt. To prevent such a disruption, the manager must clearly explain what is required from each person and how the work should be performed.

Therefore, the “Directive” management style not only serves as a means to achieve high results in a short period but also helps ensure stability and predictability within organizational processes.

Tips from Practitioners: How Managers Can Effectively Work with Mid-Level Performers

Managers working with mid-level performers often encounter a range of challenges. These employees are typically eager to take on project responsibilities but may struggle due to a lack of experience or expertise. In such scenarios, employing a “selling” leadership style can be particularly effective, as it is tailored for individuals at this stage of development.

The primary strategy for managers in this situation is to focus on both task completion and fostering harmonious team relationships. It’s crucial to recognize that mid-level performers are keen to take responsibility for specific tasks, though they might lack the necessary skills for success. For instance, a new Sales manager might be highly enthusiastic but struggle to achieve goals due to inexperience in negotiating with key clients.

Managers should adopt behaviors that emphasize task execution while providing clear instructions. This approach helps maintain the employees’ enthusiasm and their desire for responsibility. Continual feedback is also essential. For example, if a software developer completes a task with errors, managers shouldn’t just point out the flaws. Instead, they should explain how to correct them and offer assistance, boosting the employee’s confidence and accelerating their learning.

Creating a supportive environment for work and personal development is crucial. Providing opportunities for additional courses or training can greatly benefit employees. For instance, a junior analyst interested in handling large datasets might gain immense value from specialized data analysis courses, thereby becoming more proficient in their field.

By choosing a leadership style that balances control and support, a manager helps their team members successfully complete tasks and grow professionally. Ultimately, this leads to a more cohesive and productive team.

Engagement Style: How to Inspire Employees to Work Passionately for You?

If you, as a leader, find that your subordinates are lacking in initiative, avoiding responsibility, or simply hesitating to act independently, the Engagement style might be your most powerful tool. This approach is perfect for employees who have the necessary skills and knowledge but, for some reason, do not strive to perform tasks without additional motivation.

Take, for instance, manager Maria. When she noticed her team becoming lethargic and unproductive, she decided to adopt the Engagement style. Instead of issuing strict directives, Maria began actively involving her employees in the decision-making process. During meetings, she discussed ways to achieve goals, considering the opinions of all team members. This not only boosted employee motivation but also strengthened team spirit and mutual trust.

It’s an undeniable fact: employees following this style do not require rigid instructions because they already understand what’s expected of them. A crucial aspect of working with such subordinates is fostering interpersonal relationships and creating a comfortable working atmosphere. This is also evident from the experience of another company where director Anton organized regular informal meetings, allowing employees to get to know each other better. As a result, their productivity skyrocketed!

At the heart of the Engagement style is strong employee motivation to participate in problem-solving. A leader must not only involve the team but also ensure that employees feel their significance and contribution to the overall outcome. For instance, Lena, the head of the marketing department, supported her employees by addressing difficult situations and was always ready to provide resources for their ideas. She also avoided excessive supervision, allowing employees to take the initiative, which made their work more meaningful and engaging.

The “Participate” style is an incredibly effective approach for boosting employee initiative and engagement. The key is to create an environment where your team members are genuinely interested in their work and eager to actively contribute to its success. Offer your support, recognize their efforts, and foster an atmosphere of open communication. This way, every employee will feel valued and deeply involved in the team’s collaborative efforts.

Delegation as a Management Style

Delegation stands out as one of the most effective and sought-after management styles, especially in today’s fast-paced and flexible environments where such qualities are critical for success. This approach is particularly beneficial for highly skilled employees who demonstrate a high level of maturity and professionalism. The key principle behind delegation is that a manager entrusts specific tasks to their subordinates, relying on their competence and sense of responsibility.

Take, for instance, an IT company where an experienced software developer is part of the team. A manager might delegate the creation of a new module for a complex application to this developer. Possessing the necessary skills, the developer can not only complete the task faster than the manager could but also bring fresh ideas and solutions to enhance the quality of the final product.

Another example can be found in a marketing agency. A project manager might entrust the development of a comprehensive advertising campaign to a digital marketing specialist who is well-versed in the latest trends and methodologies. This trusting approach not only saves the project manager’s time, allowing them to focus on strategic tasks but also motivates the specialist, highlighting their importance and professionalism.

It is crucial that those tasked with responsibilities are not just competent but also willing to assume full accountability for achieving the desired outcomes. This enables the manager to devote more time to strategic and less routine tasks, fostering both the company’s overall growth and the personal development of its employees. Harmonious relationships within the team are built more quickly when everyone understands and respects their contributions to the collective mission.

The “delegation” management style gives leaders the ability to trust their employees with not just routine tasks but also significant decision-making. This undoubtedly improves the quality of work and raises the level of responsibility, while potentially boosting productivity. Take a startup, for instance: in an environment where quick response to market changes is crucial, delegating functions helps the team adapt and innovate more swiftly.

Thus, delegation is more than just assigning tasks—it’s about fully involving employees in decision-making and executing key company functions, which is crucial for success in today’s business world.

The Lifecycle Model by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard: Adaptive Leadership Style

Introduced in the 1960s, Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard’s lifecycle model revolutionized the field of management and leadership. This situational leadership model emphasizes the importance of adapting leadership styles based on the maturity level of subordinates. The core idea is that there isn’t a one-size-fits-all approach; instead, leadership styles must evolve to meet the needs of the team effectively.

To gain a better understanding of the model, let’s explore the four primary leadership styles:

• Directive Style (S1): The leader provides clear instructions and strictly monitors task execution. This approach is suitable for beginners or employees with low maturity levels who require specific directions.
• Coaching Style (S2): The leader not only supervises but also actively participates in training and developing subordinates. This method is effective for employees with moderate competence who have started to grasp tasks but still need support.
• Supporting Style (S3): The leader offers assistance and encouragement, promoting subordinate involvement in decision-making. Ideal for teams with good skills that still need motivation and guidance from their leader.
• Delegating Style (S4): The leader trusts subordinates to complete tasks independently, with minimal intervention. This style is most effective for experienced and highly competent employees who can work autonomously.

For example, consider applying this model in today’s IT sector. A beginner developer (low maturity) would need detailed instructions and strict oversight (S1). As they gain experience and skills, their supervisor might switch to a coaching style (S2), providing training and support. An experienced developer, strong in their methods and approaches, could be managed using a more supporting style (S3), and eventually, when fully mature, transition to the delegating model (S4).

However, despite its popularity, the model hasn’t gone without its critics. Opponents argue that simplifying styles is overly reductive and that the model fails to offer specific, consistent guidance for complex situations. Additionally, it demands a high degree of flexibility and attention from leaders, which can be challenging to attain in real-life scenarios.

Nonetheless, the Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard model remains one of the most accessible and easily applicable tools in practice. Its success hinges on a manager’s ability to carefully assess each employee’s maturity level and select the most appropriate leadership style to help achieve the team’s overall goals.

Try BrainApps
for free

59 courses
100+ brain training games
No ads

Get started